Rank #22 · Operator profile

Casoo Casino

Same-licence sister to Tsars under TRINK N.V., one of the longer-pedigree operators in the Anjouan register.

Score
6.2/10
Bonus
100% Deposit Bonus + 100 Free Spins (per operator landing at time of writing)
Licence
Anjouan
Operator entity
TRINK N.V.
Licence
Anjouan
Licence no.
ALSI-202503021-FI1
Licensee
TRINK N.V.
Domain
casoo.com
KYC threshold
Not disclosed on the public homepage at time of writing
Licence expires
March 20, 2026
Payment rails: Cards, E-wallets, Crypto (per operator landing)
Visit Casoo
Mike Vega Last reviewed May 25, 2026

Casoo Casino is operated by TRINK N.V. under Anjouan licence ALSI-202503021-FI1, the same licence as front-brand Tsars1 . Casoo’s launch year (2019 per Casino Guru) is actually a year earlier than Tsars’s, making it the longer-tenured of the two same-licence sister brands1 . The brand identity (“A Galaxy of Fun Awaits”, space-themed) positions Casoo distinctly from Tsars’s monarchic branding even though they share infrastructure. This is a profile, not a tested review.

Two brands, one licence: what this means

Tsars and Casoo are the first confirmed pair of brands sharing both a single Anjouan licence and a single operator entity in our coverage. (Spinorhino and Fenix licensees share licences across many brands, but Tsars/Casoo is the first pair we’ve directly verified via Casino Guru’s licensee field rather than inferred from a register entry.)

For prospective players, the implications of the shared-licence-and-entity structure are concrete:

  1. Player-identity tooling is likely shared. Multi-accounting between Tsars and Casoo is almost certainly a single-operator violation under the standard offshore T&Cs.
  2. Dispute escalation runs through one channel. A complaint about Tsars or Casoo escalates to the same TRINK N.V. compliance team and ultimately the same Anjouan licensee record.
  3. Self-exclusion at one likely applies to the other. Operator-level self-exclusion typically respects shared entity boundaries; if you self-exclude at Tsars, expect Casoo to honour it.
  4. Bonus abuse policies apply across both. If your account at one is closed for bonus-abuse reasons, the same policy probably applies at the other.

These are not unique to Casoo or Tsars; they are the standard implications of any shared-entity multi-brand structure in offshore licensing. Worth knowing.

What Casoo publishes

The Casoo landing page surfaces a 100% / 100-free-spins welcome bonus, “5,000+ games” claim, weekly cashback, and a loyalty programme. The space-themed brand identity and slot-aggregator-first design language places Casoo in the casual-slot-player segment versus Tsars’s broader multi-product positioning.

Specific cashier rails, KYC trigger thresholds, withdrawal caps, and bonus wagering requirements are not surfaced on the homepage we observed. The standard pre-deposit T&C reading discipline applies.

The 7-brand cluster context

Casino Guru lists Casoo as “related to 7 different casinos” alongside the cluster we discuss in the Tsars profile. Sister-brand portability is limited by the multi-entity structure of the broader cluster (Tsars + Casoo under TRINK N.V.; Wisho under Hitz Gaming OÜ; Winnerz and Trickz under Feature Buy Ltd.; Hype Kasino under a dual Feature Buy / Hitz arrangement).

What the Anjouan licence actually covers

Casoo Casino is licensed by the Anjouan Gaming Authority, the regulatory body established on the autonomous island of Anjouan (one of the three islands that make up the Union of the Comoros in the Indian Ocean). Anjouan's modern iGaming licensing framework was relaunched in 2023–2024 by Anjouan Licensing Services Inc., the exclusive licence administrator, and has been adopted at scale since by operators that previously sat under Curaçao's old master-licence system. The operator's licence number is ALSI-202503021-FI1, listed as valid on the official Anjouan licence register.

What the licence does

  • Operator vetting at issue. The framework requires KYC on beneficial owners and directors, clean criminal-record checks, source-of-funds documentation, a written business plan, and AML/KYC/responsible-gaming policies before the licence is issued.
  • Game-software certification. Operators must use certified RNG technology, with provider certificates submitted as part of the licensing pack.
  • Segregated player funds. Operators must hold player balances in accounts separate from operating funds. This is the single most consequential player-protection clause in the framework.
  • Formal complaint process. Operators must publish a complaint-handling procedure and respond to player disputes within the timeframes defined by the regulator.
  • Public register and seal verification. Every licensed operator appears on the official register with licence number, issue and expiry dates, status, and authorised domains. Operators may display a seal whose ID resolves to the register entry in real time.

What the licence does not do

  • No binding third-party adjudication. Anjouan provides a formal complaint process between player and operator, but it does not offer the binding ADR (alternative dispute resolution) tier that regulators like the UKGC or MGA mandate. If the operator refuses to pay, the regulator can revoke the licence — but does not order the operator to pay the player.
  • No deposit caps or central self-exclusion. Unlike MGA, UKGC, KSA, or Sweden's Spelpaus, Anjouan does not run a cross-operator self-exclusion register or impose mandatory deposit limits. Self-exclusion is a per-operator setting; players who want cross-operator protection have to rely on GamStop / Cruks / Spelpaus where applicable.
  • Disputes from excluded territories are not mediated. The Anjouan Gaming Board explicitly excludes mediation for players based in jurisdictions the operator was supposed to block. If you played from a restricted country, the regulator will decline the case.
  • No public dispute decisions database. There is no published archive of operator complaints and rulings comparable to the UKGC's enforcement-action page or the MGA's player-complaint summaries. Track-record information has to be reconstructed from third-party sources (Trustpilot, AskGamblers, casino-forum threads).
  • Limited recourse outside the licence. Anjouan's jurisdiction is the autonomous island, not the Comorian Union. Comorian union-level law treats most gambling as prohibited, which creates a structural mismatch: the licence is real and the regulator acts, but it operates entirely within the island's autonomy carve-out.

How this compares to other offshore licences

Anjouan sits in the same operational tier as the new Curaçao LOK framework (issued directly by the CGB since 2024, replacing the old master/sub-licence system) and Tobique (Canadian First Nation regulator that took over from Kahnawake for many crypto operators). All three offer real but light-touch licensing: operator vetting at issue, mandated segregated funds, formal complaint handling, no binding third-party arbitration, and minimal ongoing player-protection infrastructure compared to MGA, UKGC, or KSA.

In practical terms: an Anjouan licence means the operator has been vetted by a regulator that exists, will respond, and can revoke. It does not mean a player will be made whole by the regulator if the operator decides not to pay. Players who want that should play at UKGC, MGA, or comparable-tier operators, accepting the friction (KYC at every turn, withdrawal holds, deposit limits) that comes with that protection.

Our analytical position

Casoo benefits from the same operator-pedigree positives as Tsars (2019 launch is the longest operator-side history in our Anjouan coverage), the same verifiable licence-and-entity disclosure, and the same multi-brand-portability concern. The slightly lower score versus Tsars reflects the thinner public surface (less language coverage, less detailed cashier disclosure on the homepage). Score reflects: verifiable licence-and-entity disclosure (positive), longer operator pedigree than the Anjouan-register median (positive), narrower public-surface detail vs Tsars (mild negative), 7-brand-cluster portability concern (mild negative).

Score: 6.2 / 10.

Frequently asked questions

Is Casoo the same operator as Tsars?

Yes, at both the operator-entity and licence levels. Both Casoo and Tsars are operated by TRINK N.V. under Anjouan licence ALSI-202503021-FI1. Casoo launched in 2019, Tsars in 2020 per Casino Guru aggregation.

If I self-exclude at Casoo, does it apply at Tsars?

Operator-level self-exclusion typically respects shared-entity boundaries; the same TRINK N.V. compliance system that processes Casoo accounts also handles Tsars. Confirm via the operator's responsible-gambling page before relying on this assumption.

Does Casoo accept crypto?

The Tsars sister brand publishes a broad crypto-cashier (BTC, ETH, LTC, USDT, USDC, ADA, DOGE, SOL, TRX, XRP); whether Casoo surfaces the identical set is operator-specific. Verify on the live cashier before assuming.

Why does Casoo predate Tsars even though they share a licence?

The 2019 / 2020 launch dates predate the 2025-03-21 Anjouan licence issuance. The brands were operating prior to the current Anjouan licence; the operator may have held a different licence (likely Curaçao Master/Sub) during 2019-2024 and migrated to Anjouan as the current framework gained traction.

When this might not apply to you

Operator T&Cs may exclude players from specific jurisdictions; check the footer before depositing. The Anjouan framework does not include cross-operator self-exclusion.

References

  1. Casino Guru Casoo review (licence number, operator entity, established year) , Casino Guru
  2. Tsars.com footer (shared licence reference) , Tsars Casino