Rank #32 · Operator profile
Rajabets
India-targeted sister of Reybets under one Anjouan licence. Both domains returned HTTP 403 from our EU test location.
- Licence
- Anjouan
- Test access
- HTTP 403 Forbidden
- Licence
- Anjouan
- Licence no.
- ALSI-202509014-FI1
- Licensee
- 3-102-936502 SRL
- Domain
- rajabets.com
- KYC threshold
- Not visible from our test location
- Licence expires
- September 15, 2026
Rajabets is the India-targeted brand under Anjouan licence ALSI-202509014-FI1, sister to the Latin-American-targeted Reybets under one Costa Rican licensee1 . The “raja” (Hindi/Sanskrit for king) and “rey” (Spanish for king) thematic pairing is a deliberate language-market split using the same king-themed brand identity. Both domains returned HTTP 403 (Forbidden) from our EU test location at time of writing. This is a profile, not a tested review.
The thoughtful brand-pair structure
We covered the underlying logic in the Reybets profile, but it bears repeating because it is genuinely unusual for the offshore-licensee tier. Most multi-brand stables we have seen (Fenix, Spinorhino) reach across markets with unrelated brand names, phoenix iconography, dragon iconography, casual mainstream framing, German prefixes, etc. The pattern reads as “throw brand variations at the market and see what sticks.”
Rajabets and Reybets do something different. The same king-theme is rendered in two different languages targeting two specific markets:
- Rajabets (Hindi/Sanskrit “raja”) for the Indian market.
- Reybets (Spanish “rey”) for Latin American Spanish-speaking markets.
This is a language-aware sister-brand pairing: one operator concept, two market-specific renderings. It is more thoughtful than the generic-multi-brand pattern and worth flagging as a positive structural signal. Whether the actual product (lobby, payments, customer support) is localised to the same degree is something we cannot verify from a 403 response.
What we cannot evaluate
Same constraints as the Reybets profile: bonus terms, payment rails, KYC threshold, withdrawal behaviour, game catalogue. The 403 is consistent with edge-layer geo-restriction or Cloudflare bot-detection challenge.
India-market context
We covered the Indian market dynamics in the Bombay.vip profile and the Sikwin profile. Briefly:
- Cricket dominates Indian sports betting; IPL is the peak window.
- State-by-state gambling law variation; no national framework permits real-money offshore casinos.
- UPI and card-rail friction; operators usually go through crypto or intermediaries.
- English + Hindi UI conventions; operator-defaults vary.
Rajabets is one of several India-targeted Anjouan operators in our coverage (alongside Bombay.vip and Sikwin). Among these three, the structural distinctions are:
| Operator | Licence parent | Sister brands | Distinctive feature |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bombay.vip | 3-102-936594 SRL | None | Single-domain focused, VIP-coded TLD |
| Sikwin | 12 Stars International | Bet7ek (unreachable), Eagle777 (testimonial concerns), Bety (for sale) | Cleanest brand in a transitioning estate |
| Rajabets | 3-102-936502 SRL | Reybets (Latin American sister) | Language-aware cross-market pairing |
What the Anjouan licence actually covers
Rajabets is licensed by the Anjouan Gaming Authority,
the regulatory body established on the autonomous island of Anjouan
(one of the three islands that make up the Union of the Comoros in
the Indian Ocean). Anjouan's modern iGaming licensing framework was
relaunched in 2023–2024 by Anjouan Licensing Services Inc., the
exclusive licence administrator, and has been adopted at scale since
by operators that previously sat under Curaçao's old master-licence
system.
The operator's licence number is ALSI-202509014-FI1, listed as valid on the
official Anjouan licence register.
What the licence does
- Operator vetting at issue. The framework requires KYC on beneficial owners and directors, clean criminal-record checks, source-of-funds documentation, a written business plan, and AML/KYC/responsible-gaming policies before the licence is issued.
- Game-software certification. Operators must use certified RNG technology, with provider certificates submitted as part of the licensing pack.
- Segregated player funds. Operators must hold player balances in accounts separate from operating funds. This is the single most consequential player-protection clause in the framework.
- Formal complaint process. Operators must publish a complaint-handling procedure and respond to player disputes within the timeframes defined by the regulator.
- Public register and seal verification. Every licensed operator appears on the official register with licence number, issue and expiry dates, status, and authorised domains. Operators may display a seal whose ID resolves to the register entry in real time.
What the licence does not do
- No binding third-party adjudication. Anjouan provides a formal complaint process between player and operator, but it does not offer the binding ADR (alternative dispute resolution) tier that regulators like the UKGC or MGA mandate. If the operator refuses to pay, the regulator can revoke the licence — but does not order the operator to pay the player.
- No deposit caps or central self-exclusion. Unlike MGA, UKGC, KSA, or Sweden's Spelpaus, Anjouan does not run a cross-operator self-exclusion register or impose mandatory deposit limits. Self-exclusion is a per-operator setting; players who want cross-operator protection have to rely on GamStop / Cruks / Spelpaus where applicable.
- Disputes from excluded territories are not mediated. The Anjouan Gaming Board explicitly excludes mediation for players based in jurisdictions the operator was supposed to block. If you played from a restricted country, the regulator will decline the case.
- No public dispute decisions database. There is no published archive of operator complaints and rulings comparable to the UKGC's enforcement-action page or the MGA's player-complaint summaries. Track-record information has to be reconstructed from third-party sources (Trustpilot, AskGamblers, casino-forum threads).
- Limited recourse outside the licence. Anjouan's jurisdiction is the autonomous island, not the Comorian Union. Comorian union-level law treats most gambling as prohibited, which creates a structural mismatch: the licence is real and the regulator acts, but it operates entirely within the island's autonomy carve-out.
How this compares to other offshore licences
Anjouan sits in the same operational tier as the new Curaçao LOK framework (issued directly by the CGB since 2024, replacing the old master/sub-licence system) and Tobique (Canadian First Nation regulator that took over from Kahnawake for many crypto operators). All three offer real but light-touch licensing: operator vetting at issue, mandated segregated funds, formal complaint handling, no binding third-party arbitration, and minimal ongoing player-protection infrastructure compared to MGA, UKGC, or KSA.
In practical terms: an Anjouan licence means the operator has been vetted by a regulator that exists, will respond, and can revoke. It does not mean a player will be made whole by the regulator if the operator decides not to pay. Players who want that should play at UKGC, MGA, or comparable-tier operators, accepting the friction (KYC at every turn, withdrawal holds, deposit limits) that comes with that protection.
Our analytical position
Rajabets is the India-side of a thoughtful Latin-American/Indian sister-brand pair under one Anjouan licensee, with a focused 2-domain footprint and a current licence. The brand-pair logic is positive (consistent theme, deliberate language-market segmentation), but we cannot evaluate operator-side facts from a 403 response. Score reflects: thoughtful brand-stable language pairing (positive), current licence (neutral), focused 2-domain licensee (positive), bare-403 restriction posture from our EU IP (mild negative; less player-friendly than DEP Casino’s structured block), unverifiable operator-side claims (neutral negative).
Score: 5.8 / 10, same as the Reybets sibling (the operator analysis is structurally the same).
Frequently asked questions
Is Rajabets the same operator as Reybets?
Yes. Both brands operate under Anjouan licence ALSI-202509014-FI1 and Costa Rican SRL 3-102-936502. The naming difference (Raja = Hindi king, Rey = Spanish king) is a deliberate language-market pairing under one operator with one shared theme.
Why is Rajabets blocked from my IP?
Our EU test location received HTTP 403 (Forbidden) at the operator's edge. The most likely explanations are IP-based geo-restriction for non-supported markets, or a Cloudflare bot-detection challenge that our request failed. From a supported region (likely India given the brand naming) the lobby should be accessible.
Is Rajabets safer than Bombay.vip or Sikwin?
All three are Anjouan-licensed India-targeted operators with similar baseline player protections. Differences are structural: Bombay.vip is focused-single-brand; Sikwin is in an estate with concerning sister brands; Rajabets has a thoughtful Latin-American sister-brand pairing. None is binding-ADR-tier; all sit in the same offshore protection profile.
What does 'Raja' mean in the brand name?
King in Hindi and Sanskrit. The brand uses the king theme as its positioning anchor for the Indian market; the sister brand 'Reybets' uses the Spanish word for king ('rey') for Latin American markets.
When this might not apply to you
Players outside India will find the operator’s product surface less relevant (cashier defaulting to Indian rails, sportsbook cricket-weighted). Anjouan licensing does not include cross-operator self-exclusion.
What to read next
- The Reybets profile for the Latin American sister brand under the same licence.
- The Bombay.vip profile for an India-focused single-brand alternative.
- The Sikwin profile for another India-focused brand under a different licensee.
References
- Anjouan licence register entry (3-102-936502 SRL) , Anjouan Gaming Authority